From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA9213888F for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 899EF21C038; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D9021C022 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-215-34.unity-media.net [37.201.215.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F217340712 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <22049.17676.1822.986579@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <56223E25.1090407@gentoo.org> <562243E0.509@gentoo.org> <20151017154703.3cefdd78@gentoo.org> From: hasufell Message-ID: <562262A8.8090509@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:00:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151017154703.3cefdd78@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ed90ad53-765a-4394-bbb9-80ffb362449f X-Archives-Hash: 1f8c4187e0ae741f46bd2cf4ea397d6e On 10/17/2015 03:47 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:49:36 +0200 > hasufell wrote: > > [...] >> You can apply the patches post_unpack or post_src_prepare witht hooks. >> What's the problem? > > autoreconf > Can you elaborate why this would be a problem?