From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-72755-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B9B13888F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8681B21C02D;
	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:28:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBE421C013
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-215-34.unity-media.net [37.201.215.34])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FB7234087C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:28:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <22049.17676.1822.986579@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
 <CAHmME9rkY4tXybnCqS=cXCph=qrxyCO8+-jhM9tiL71G6gkt+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151017142418.006bc430.mgorny@gentoo.org>
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <56223EEE.1070903@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:28:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151017142418.006bc430.mgorny@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 0e7a426c-1c60-42d7-9b45-55539e9cdc62
X-Archives-Hash: 4e443b88eff572941b056f11ecd2f29c

On 10/17/2015 02:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> 
> 2. eapply_user really belongs in the PM, especially if it's run by
> default. And it needs patch applying function. And if we have to
> implement patch applying function anyway, we may as well make it public
> to avoid unnecessary duplication.
> 

Unreliable. The ebuild may define its own src_prepare function or the PM
might define eapply_user as a no-op, which is valid as per PMS.