From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-72546-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54BE13888F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2015 16:25:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1862521C018;
	Fri,  9 Oct 2015 16:25:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0789321C00B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Oct 2015 16:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-213-217.unity-media.net [37.201.213.217])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1538340566;
	Fri,  9 Oct 2015 16:25:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in:
 eclass/
References: <1444389412.5220bb29741e1685b42a6312c0b7bf2821672040.aballier@gentoo>
 <5617DE06.5050200@gentoo.org> <20151009182136.251dc51e@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
To: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <5617EA6C.3000905@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:25:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151009182136.251dc51e@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c7ef5831-f656-466b-bbfb-26cbcda9e5c1
X-Archives-Hash: f32e87d4bd1de54f49e62083986adf8f

On 10/09/2015 06:21 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> Ofc, I will expect people to jump in and say "the council hasn't
>> decided on that yet", but well... it mostly works fine and is not
>> really controversial.
> 
> not sure if council approval is needed; uniformity and consistency is
> way more important than whatever syntax is used
> 

I agree.

There is https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561190 and
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge/GLEP:66 but as you can see
it is mostly empty.