From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C64138827 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F06AE21C060; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2479D21C052 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.123.52] (unknown [50.120.197.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grknight) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E45F934095A for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20151001134947.GM5374@vapier.lan> <20151002022109.1f211ef9@caribou.gateway.pace.com> From: Brian Evans Message-ID: <560E983B.4090304@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:44:11 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bbbd9a5f-19bd-4c7d-b45c-2053864008a4 X-Archives-Hash: c7cbaed61e825f66cdbd4c8a1c8318dd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/2/2015 10:27 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill > wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger >> wrote: I think we need a news item to remind >> people they really do have to emerge -e @world after this one or >> they could have a bad time. > > I was able to get by with a targeted revdep-rebuild run. > > revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc\+\+\.so\.6' > > The backslashes are significant since revdep-rebuild passes the > expression to grep -E. > > Is there any reason to rebuild programs that do not link with the > C++ standard library? > I would propose: revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc\+\+\.so\.6' -- --exclude sys-devel/gcc I don't think we really need to have gcc rebuild itself for the ABI change. Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWDpg6AAoJENH3ge/59KO2jqAP/2VrtExN7vWd0M2dN9te0B0H /3tkMpxj4llQHo30oDNHISrADz/lBH1Q+c5YImQgOx+kfFMWlzqSsTS5F2KlnOHl lpYJu3BQ24wh5R84PagHbf2FpKZm8d50pN4dH0n0fry9A/khZxnLfDjpjuTTdHLN GWNl4HWdcMyVlFv/Hj8Yx4PVamgF7XqJsu+gD0reawNimjudgOq8q3Q4fUHhK1/0 1znKYRknA0DfSWUmyX8NTPkBaqYEBnB0aD/QZ9tcWXeR6F9+mCkmkNtCR6J3ds4B DzXqWjGH5ZpT1DO4bsyh+X2AoLd4j5DzIJT3pNPW/PUya3O3yH2r6gJhYXxolf/s lLJi10aYLFEwswZ4ZcjkgOQCti8Xvn6fK1/D/EC8MUmUnWYogNS2ulf2/iUlU01q JH+MLdE76j0KGa1vJNJN8fB6z7CuoOsLY/q7FNrVR3XXsyMKPoIxmsyPFfXX+y07 SWnO3tGLfZ+q82SvnX40ynnGPdl9Sp6nu/fya7liKjmtijdWNW9ZNpfw/qLGNJyb +CT5qnzRitfVwRr1CgY9K7ZCTCdLs8Qw4VkJHk+QNH5ggMsvA651MyCJZmUJ6lRN 1KEVAsT29U1nVo+oMQggj3VMY5Lqvk0Fe8ScF2unS4ts32/udlareWHK6o1T5PcU /7+orcUb1IODrKlfADrc =pkRt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----