Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

[Brian Evans <grknight@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/2/2015 10:27 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ryan Hill <rhill@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:49:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger
>> <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: I think we need a news item to remind
>> people they really do have to emerge -e @world after this one or
>> they could have a bad time.
> 
> I was able to get by with a targeted revdep-rebuild run.
> 
> revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc\+\+\.so\.6'
> 
> The backslashes are significant since revdep-rebuild passes the 
> expression to grep -E.
> 
> Is there any reason to rebuild programs that do not link with the
> C++ standard library?
> 

I would propose:
revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc\+\+\.so\.6' -- --exclude sys-devel/gcc

I don't think we really need to have gcc rebuild itself for the ABI
change.

Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=pkRt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----