From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NNXT1-0007S7-TN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:05:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DBC6E07AD for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com (mail-yw0-f181.google.com [209.85.211.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6D3E078D for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh11 with SMTP id 11so7969624ywh.9 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:36:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QGU6KEH+vagz+B64q0nYs4pcfXYTcx5MFSfaLu2djVY=; b=SbWxvax1wKxsskeaFVSpeZ3cFnLkSoLvbYlcMae/0bvqlOecM011+Uje9A1asC1wVr 31kSpfS0FngzAtoVZBeQcK6Zticzo9TJOUI9S8W2mVw/6E1QiNqWCpBaKB1KHFJn/5+Z DPbK87vpOPaSKsY+3/A1wlT9kjHoKS0Ufn1hc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cfxtafvi6zvA9B4uGTdlJhNTnG3Bvr6UrG6SjzJh9yCim4pXmt7U0G7afGRJuXYmH1 cKglvYCwdbiKLeOmnpS5ELuVEmM4VZpFP07Zo5Jt/JnZCGi6vI2xenY5y97okMY4xj85 yClPMNjaNIZg2afl5qNMYyhPvMHvEPhZPU+VQ= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.devrieze@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.50.36 with SMTP id x36mr16412973anx.151.1261593387324; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:36:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B288301.5030808@gentoo.org> References: <200912071256.50485.bangert@gentoo.org> <1260205453.12837.21.camel@localhost> <200912072120.44046.bangert@gentoo.org> <1260890340.29419.142.camel@tablet> <4B288301.5030808@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:36:27 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6837d44c8bd76829 Message-ID: <55e0be1b0912231036q533f43ccx2425383804da561@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9472f76c-e6d7-4fbd-9fe6-74bfeecbddf5 X-Archives-Hash: b1154fdb832dffd77d37215c5b39bfaf On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:49 AM, R=C3=A9mi Cardona wrote: > Le 15/12/2009 16:19, Peter Volkov a =C3=A9crit : >> >> we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first >> =C2=A0then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds wit= h >> different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279206#c4 . > > Others and I actually make use of the order in metadata.xml. The first en= try > is the one that will get bugs assignment in bugzilla, and the others will > get CCed. > > So if we're really going with herds first in metadata.xml, could we have = an > optional attribute - or whatever else you see fit - to convey that _this_ > herd/maintainer is the "main" herd/maintainer? > > Thanks > Perhaps we should create a schema to validate the file. XMLSchema (or any of the other standards) allows for much more flexibility in specifying these things. Btw. I did not design the metadata DTD for order to be significant. The only priority is that maintainer goes before herd, that's all. Paul --=20 Paul de Vrieze