From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPt6C-0001e2-RN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:27:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4FAEE080E; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601FBE080E for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1013518wah.10 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:26:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=RM7zM86vlxnV/Tq858qUtBveReDOEstytSMhsp2ED1I=; b=V5KU/glqmvNeaHWN59XoZtcI835atORTB7C8zzGJFBSlLNjST7WAaoO3Cd/Gru+TUohzqXqh8UyL7PjAO28QRGbrSTi/5Xu462Yc+LPgEL27AAqYzldylZvomiQP4HwjxY9ZbfpiYvpGA7fXx3hl8UGSFBKVRJqIDPPsIIolQq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=v3yD+V7daMfefbo9GA/H0YWcvBjQ/nktobbQtbSKO6YGdolZXE69MfdWv3JA2v8HyUpgOrjWRaBfVQ3LuJcXv0uKI2aIAwxNMTtIOE4Qdp3xbyY8c8hNEDCxl5bBW9HtIH722nsFCX/2GFdXFir5Levr+RrsZ0qmj8uU9KhQzSU= Received: by 10.114.78.1 with SMTP id a1mr2466575wab.102.1203053217526; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.177.8 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:26:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <55e0be1b0802142126o56fd209hdc4a32256dfa53c1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:26:57 +1100 From: "Paul de Vrieze" Sender: paul.devrieze@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6568_15943590.1203053217520" References: <20080213210132.720760ba@gentoo.org> <20080213213836.18f659ef@gentoo.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 717cd68e93bb09eb X-Archives-Salt: 1555e507-a158-42a4-abe8-0654ed34f501 X-Archives-Hash: 87def792605e934c1bea28c08c940ddc ------=_Part_6568_15943590.1203053217520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Markus Meier posted > 20080213213836.18f659ef@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 > 21:38:36 +0100: > > > djvu: Enable support for DjVu (a digital document format with advanced > > compression technology and high performance value) > > I'm not complaining if this is deemed acceptable, but I thought the idea > was to keep it to 80 chars, if possible. If that's the case, perhaps > leaving it at (a digital document format) might be preferable. That > still says at least what it is, so is workable IMO, even if the longer > description is certainly nicer if the 80 char limit no longer applies. > What about: djvu: support DjVu, a PDF-like document format esp. suited for scanned documents -- Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: paul.devrieze@gmail.com Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net ------=_Part_6568_15943590.1203053217520 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org> posted
20080213213836.18f659ef@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Wed, 13 Feb 2008
21:38:36 +0100:

> djvu: Enable support for DjVu (a digital document format with advanced
> compression technology and high performance value)

I'm not complaining if this is deemed acceptable, but I thought the idea
was to keep it to 80 chars, if possible.  If that's the case, perhaps
leaving it at (a digital document format) might be preferable.  That
still says at least what it is, so is workable IMO, even if the longer
description is certainly nicer if the 80 char limit no longer applies.

What about:
djvu: support DjVu, a PDF-like document format esp. suited for scanned documents

--
Paul de Vrieze
Researcher
Mail: paul.devrieze@gmail.com
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net ------=_Part_6568_15943590.1203053217520-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list