From: Daniel Campbell <zlg@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="gui"
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:52:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F36950.7050803@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F33ABC.4070509@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 09/11/2015 01:34 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 08:03 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>> So, IUSE="X" has generally been used for gui, but more
>> technically it's used to depend on and build against x11-libs/*
>> packages. The fact that this gives a GUI is practically a
>> side-effect. When wayland comes along, do these packages still
>> build against x11-libs/* to support wayland?
>>
>> I'm just wondering if we're jumping the gun a little bit on
>> IUSE="gui".. yes it'll be nice to have one flag that "just
>> works" for anyone not caring about the details, but it'll also
>> mean propagating a slew of REQUIRED_USE="
>> {X,wayland,gtk,qt4,qt5}? ( gui )" entries and a lot of extra
>> use-defaults which may or may not cleanup the sub-profiles of
>> desktop/ ....
>>
>> Also, I believe we need to have the conversation about the pros
>> and cons of IUSE=gui here before the council meeting, yes?
>>
>
>
> I already use IUSE=gui and will keep doing that.
>
> USE flags in gentoo are the best and the worst thing at the same
> time. They are also mostly the main reason people don't like
> gentoo, because USE flags are (for todays situation) pretty much
> not an appropriate pattern to reflect real-world configuration. To
> be more precise... USE flags are first-class citizens and there is
> only one layer of them. There's not configuration
> pattern/abstraction behind them. If you wonder what I am talking
> about, have a look at NixOS. The reason we lack proper declarative
> configuration is also the reason we had to introduce this ugliness
> called REQUIRED_USE. Instead of saying "gui.gtk" we say
> "REQUIRED_USE="gui? ( || ( gtk ... ) )". And it will get worse. I
> wonder when people start realizing that.
>
So are you suggesting maybe we come up with namespaced USE flags? That
would be interesting.
- --
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=jIAs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-09 7:20 [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium gtk3 support Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
2015-09-09 7:24 ` Daniel Campbell
2015-09-09 8:52 ` Andrew Savchenko
2015-09-09 10:37 ` hasufell
2015-09-09 13:17 ` Brian Dolbec
2015-09-09 13:31 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 6:21 ` Daniel Campbell
2015-09-10 8:47 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 10:45 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 10:50 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 12:03 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 12:13 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 12:25 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 12:33 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 12:44 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 12:53 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 13:10 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 15:35 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 15:41 ` Alec Warner
2015-09-10 15:50 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 16:50 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 16:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2015-09-10 13:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alan McKinnon
2015-09-10 12:46 ` Alec Ten Harmsel
2015-09-10 13:07 ` Michał Górny
2015-09-10 13:20 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 14:31 ` Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2015-09-10 15:38 ` Alec Warner
2015-09-10 16:37 ` Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2015-09-10 16:57 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 17:17 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 18:05 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 18:22 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-10 18:30 ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
2015-09-10 17:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2015-09-10 19:04 ` Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2015-09-10 18:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2015-09-10 16:24 ` Alec Ten Harmsel
2015-09-10 16:50 ` Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2015-09-10 12:47 ` Michael Orlitzky
2015-09-10 16:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2015-09-10 18:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " Daniel Campbell
2015-09-10 18:21 ` hasufell
2015-09-10 18:26 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-11 9:03 ` Daniel Campbell
2015-09-11 12:13 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-11 17:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2015-09-11 17:41 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-11 18:03 ` [gentoo-dev] USE="gui" Ian Stakenvicius
2015-09-11 18:16 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-11 20:34 ` hasufell
2015-09-11 23:52 ` Daniel Campbell [this message]
2015-09-12 11:47 ` hasufell
2015-09-12 2:29 ` [gentoo-dev] USE="gui" Duncan
2015-09-12 4:45 ` Dale
2015-09-12 2:24 ` Duncan
2015-09-12 4:55 ` [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium gtk3 support Raymond Jennings
2015-09-12 10:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2015-09-12 10:48 ` Rich Freeman
2015-09-13 5:07 ` Duncan
2015-09-12 10:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Rich Freeman
2015-09-09 10:06 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox gtk3 status, danger of gtk2 in-tree deprecation? (was: www-client/chromium gtk3 support) Duncan
2015-09-09 15:12 ` »Q«
2015-09-10 2:23 ` Duncan
2015-09-09 15:32 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox gtk3 status, danger of gtk2 in-tree deprecation? Ian Stakenvicius
2015-09-10 2:02 ` Duncan
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium gtk3 support Alexandre Rostovtsev
2015-09-10 6:28 ` Daniel Campbell
2015-09-09 15:00 ` Mike Gilbert
2015-09-09 15:10 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2015-09-09 15:16 ` Alec Warner
2015-09-09 15:40 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2015-09-09 15:48 ` hasufell
2015-09-09 16:14 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2015-09-09 16:36 ` hasufell
2015-09-09 18:17 ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-10 6:58 [gentoo-dev] About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles Pacho Ramos
2012-04-10 7:12 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2012-04-16 8:11 ` [gentoo-dev] USE=gui? (was: About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles) Michał Górny
2012-04-16 8:22 ` [gentoo-dev] USE=gui? Samuli Suominen
2012-04-16 14:49 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-04-16 17:12 ` Michał Górny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F36950.7050803@gentoo.org \
--to=zlg@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox