From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-71952-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5970138454
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6A7A21C015;
	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:50:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD22621C00E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:50:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:96de:80ff:fe6b:ddcc] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:96de:80ff:fe6b:ddcc])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ECAD340680
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium gtk3 support
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <55EFDDAD.9030502@gentoo.org> <55EFDEC7.1070403@gentoo.org>
 <55F00BFD.7050804@gentoo.org> <55F12159.3020506@gentoo.org>
 <55F1439E.1070002@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_kMxJ4mKE88-R9BwAG0PMrrB6j_HR87f9uWFvNH-hCWvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <55F16059.9090502@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_nE8E_qKcB3va=iefaMKWTT1HjCgvppOH7C69tw5YS5vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <55F173F3.7040806@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=_d89aMDDBvR9mBqmFe528DtHhbCq8C11cQyWS3i2+PQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <55F17885.2050103@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_njZ-o7B_W-87KFh_LYZ-J4zKmQLw5SLEi-rzVQpy6YQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <55F17D51.1040500@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=Eo98=vP9HTBm72=KxK_VUrB_CYLs=Hu5Qa9iK-JPOPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <55F1A359.7050007@gentoo.org>
 <CAAr7Pr_RW9J3W6E-4JLe=PJnHZBTuELOa=EM+BBJm+vKkaznfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <55F1B4D8.9000602@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:50:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAr7Pr_RW9J3W6E-4JLe=PJnHZBTuELOa=EM+BBJm+vKkaznfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: b8db5289-0cce-4dc3-a5d3-dfb04f1b7a10
X-Archives-Hash: f2630dbf6bebb4ad7a4f63bf3dabc27c

On 09/10/2015 05:41 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> 
> There are lots of topics where I concede that QA has a point and can
> utilize its influence; but 'consistency and usability' are not topics I
> would normally expect them to impose on developers.
> 

I am pretty sure tree consistency was the reason QA was founded.