From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CCE1384C3 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 05:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7096D142AA; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 05:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3571426A for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 05:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-73-53-75-119.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.53.75.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zlg) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 981A83408A2 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 05:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-rust category To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <55EB409D.9090508@gentoo.org> <55EB4ABA.7080108@gentoo.org> <55EB5D35.3040406@gentoo.org> <55ECA963.7050400@gentoo.org> From: Daniel Campbell X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55ED208E.9000503@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:28:46 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55ECA963.7050400@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 580cb444-51d2-4a15-8361-8b5d38323db2 X-Archives-Hash: 9849a8b08254ba57ea6460a46274c784 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 09/06/2015 02:00 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > >>> I think cargo should probably go in dev-util with other rust >>> libraries and programs going into dev-rust as needed, but >>> that's just me :D >> >> Agreed. dev-util until it grows in size (isn't the >> recommendation 5-10+ pkgs?), then dev-rust. Despite the package >> moves being somewhat cumbersome, it makes more sense to do it >> once it's clear Rust has an ecosystem going rather than catch >> stragglers in its infancy. >> > > Ok, looks quite logical for me. So the next question. I remember > portage had some problems with moving packages. Would it work if > I'll move dev-rust/cargo to dev-util/cargo in our overlay now. And > later when rust infrastructure grows move it in the main tree back > to dev-rust? Or will it break something? > > -- Jauhien > > Now that we're on git, I don't see why a quick `git mv old-cat/foo new-cat/foo` wouldn't get the job done. Don't quote me on it, but my guess is it would work fine. Then make sure the profile data gets updated by updating the relevant file(s). If you're keeping it in an overlay until you think it's ready for the Gentoo repo, you may as well keep it whatever you want since it's not bound by Gentoo policy. I would start with dev-util, even in tree, and migrate to dev-rust when it reaches critical mass on packages (I'd say at least ten). - -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV7SCKAAoJEAEkDpRQOeFwragP/3bctbH+sUZxgmngJqymK1sc boLJGR8Y0JPqZmKqULR6hDjsfisNSsyRNlMZ7yNQVy/8cMT0pafdiIyLok9YMnPC JU3AGf5dWqTf9kNXwThvdtx4AVInmcRsf5VOsrmBQZeu9QivviCikiEga/dOLMit UMx/so5AkizYEDOU7mtBg5NOV8w1pQmAZ1Cdv94yHmo4Lp/k3hRAuCZv4mMknkBR 1wuz4A+PzyAPse4gCS/ss/hxVqSxuXSSec7Pq6Jc2YLgAJoDLAgePt4X7fkY8+pR v8N6n6aEM7FZPpEJWTgRtYcdstieC1Ng+0QSiEYDjxPEdno6zUiZ26/RUPEualEQ DNbwejRiNh23WYVS/4iDGgV+aiyNQkDqyxFuJQUcpNg8mSbtaforLz6EPUA03Qsy 1cl8zn+5TDf7FaCLtBukNGov6oYM9c6VVhF2YQ2mXRLgfb7l/w85m79Y/OX2SoL/ h8TDOnAugtoqYvwUIpJfHvrBGXHkYVIFdXGO7I4wqMv+gTuuNBWA2Fo2xASDR7vl NIt7blYYfgLksM2epVlllp0jlgj2FVUNMw/aGvR0Yl10WFl3+wXEsrJqUhfIzOAe ekwGXuPqKelZ7vhDyYzPA8VatbzLpRhu0e1MKvs6WuGlTJUg93+o9FrL9ZOoJ0Q7 Suy7fRZcp6ky32QtFUFl =pnJI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----