From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-71321-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D621386F1
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:03:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C01ED141AD;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:02:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E661A14040
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:02:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:220:b9ff:fe79:9130] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:220:b9ff:fe79:9130])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E50634092A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:02:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo>
 <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> <20150809215605.27ae6427@pomiot>
 <20150810004409.59637bea9aefd3f045b67614@gentoo.org>
 <20150810004044.76dda6e6@pomiot>
 <20150810021601.cdcae7226373ecd0d284086a@gentoo.org>
 <21959.62847.967959.705319@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <55C7F833.6040408@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 03:02:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <21959.62847.967959.705319@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: acc9b395-f479-4ea1-a76d-b8d34f4339cc
X-Archives-Hash: 12460a3220fa6ba73dcabc6bd8c192e3

On 08/10/2015 02:51 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> 
>> This is not a matter of going l33t, this is a matter of getting rid
>> of redundant and pretty much useless data all the same through
>> almost all commit messages.
> 
> +1
> 
> "Gentoo-Bug: 123456" or even "Bug: 123456" is enough to uniquely
> identify a bug. Also it is easier to read (and to type) than its URL
> equivalent.
> 

So, would this replace the bug number reference in the summary? Should
we tell people to reference the bug only in the commit message description?

Or do we say:
* bug number in summary optional
* bug number in description mandatory via "Gentoo-Bug: 1234"