Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

[hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>]

On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29
> hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> 
>> On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
>>> commit:     40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1
>>> Author:     Michael Weber <xmw <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
>>> AuthorDate: Sun Aug  9 13:58:26 2015 +0000
>>> Commit:     Michael Weber <xmw <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
>>> CommitDate: Sun Aug  9 13:58:26 2015 +0000
>>> URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=40b3fd64
>>>
>>> sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk (bug 557022, thanks Helmut Jarausch).
>>>
>>
>> I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports.
>> The portage team already does something like that:
>> https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3
>>
>> Following that, the commit could have been:
>> =====
>> sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk
>>
>> thanks to Helmut Jarausch
>>
>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022
>> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022
>> =====
> 
> Which is terribly redundant. Just put the whole bug URL. Advantages:
> 
> - keeps the bug namespaced to bugs.gentoo.org,
> - has the bug no inside,
> - is convenient -- you can click it instead of copy-pasting the no.
> 
> Also there are some standard keywords that are sometimes used to
> reference bugs, like 'Fixes:' used by x.org.
> 

I am not sure what exactly you do propose.