From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5C41386F1 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6602CE0806; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7E3E07FA for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:96de:80ff:fe6b:ddcc] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:96de:80ff:fe6b:ddcc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF79F340A60 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/) To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo> <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> <55C76603.7020109@gentoo.org> <20150809150325.GA7408@gentoo.org> <20150809151932.GA32189@skade.schwarzvogel.de> From: hasufell Message-ID: <55C77214.107@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:30:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150809151932.GA32189@skade.schwarzvogel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fb2e3d9e-f1cd-4a0b-a2c6-911b946ffd40 X-Archives-Hash: 01266ab7580e9a71be3d286be052acdc On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that >>>> parse commit messages. >>> >>> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all >>> purposes, even for tools. >> >> I'm pretty sure the majority of developers don't care that one developer >> uses "X-Gentoo-Bug" and another just adds it to the commit title. >> >> I like /guidelines/ in the sense that, if I don't know something, I can look >> it up. But don't make it mandatory until we start depending on it (for >> instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit >> message). > > I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was > for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in > style. > I'd be fine with that and add a reference to the kernel guideline [0] to the wiki as well, so that it is clear that we also allow/use Acked-by, Reviewed-by, Suggested-by and whatnot. I'll wait for more ++ though. [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches