From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F21D1386F1 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 939BAE07EB; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716B4E07E1 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CA31340A42 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/) To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo> <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org> <55C76603.7020109@gentoo.org> From: Michael Orlitzky X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C769A9.9030305@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:54:33 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 55dde401-fbdb-4961-9fd4-1b6074897d01 X-Archives-Hash: 6ba8dbeecaeba3e3dcf9ad846fe8a3ba On 08/09/2015 10:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell wrote: >>> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it >>> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if >>> you have a single-line commit message only. >> >> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that >> parse commit messages. > > I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all > purposes, even for tools. > > Also, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648. > There's a "standard" set of patch tags all in the style of RFC822 headers -- Signed-off-by, Acked-by, Suggested-by, etc. are all common: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches X-Gentoo-Bug is just following that example for metadata.