From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-71279-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC3A1386F1
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE0AF1426D;
	Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:47:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9FD5141CD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:96de:80ff:fe6b:ddcc] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:908:b30:55a0:96de:80ff:fe6b:ddcc])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B780A3406C0
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  9 Aug 2015 14:47:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re:
 [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1439128706.40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1.xmw@gentoo>
 <55C75F19.90201@gentoo.org>
 <CAKmKYaCvBt=+PPjdWSU_nyTJspoD=67phtHCQhDhHA0wMOdnTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55C76603.7020109@gentoo.org>
 <CAKmKYaDLp3KUG4iGZXysRYhRKPHE8why07FJ6mykE7uEhR6asQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <55C76805.9050601@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 16:47:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKmKYaDLp3KUG4iGZXysRYhRKPHE8why07FJ6mykE7uEhR6asQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c2fdf11b-20d6-4b20-bcb5-d9032d16d90a
X-Archives-Hash: c3a1180a84828d06ac582feb762388b9

On 08/09/2015 04:43 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it
>>> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if
>>> you have a single-line commit message only.
>>
>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that
>> parse commit messages.
> 
> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all
> purposes, even for tools.
> 
> Also, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648.
> 

That can be ambiguous, because it isn't clear whether you are
referencing a gentoo bug. You can reference bugs from other bugtrackers
as well.