From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440FD138CDB for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B8C4E08AB; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD36E0880 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.34] (87-253-4-166.pppoe.yaroslavl.ru [87.253.4.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zlogene) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE660340D15 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <557979AE.4060308@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:06:06 +0300 From: Mikle Kolyada User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ban EAPI 1 References: <21880.41310.990849.599309@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <21880.41310.990849.599309@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 31d89619-42f3-4a80-8f9e-85ca834cbea3 X-Archives-Hash: ab2ede9c516291a0ea57e2c9146dfd64 10.06.2015 23:43, Ulrich Mueller пишет: > Hi, > The number of EAPI 1 ebuilds in the Portage tree has decreased to > a total of 60, corresponding to 0.16 %. > > We briefly discussed in the QA team if we should demote EAPI 1 in > layout.conf from "eapis-deprecated" to "eapis-banned". This would > have the consequence that repoman would refuse to commit packages > containing such ebuilds. AFAICS there would be no impact on users. > > What do you think? > > Ulrich lets do it quick. :)