From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB406138CD2 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 11:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84EDBE0821; Fri, 15 May 2015 11:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3ED2E0819 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 11:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9424340D0B for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 11:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5555DA47.40504@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 07:36:39 -0400 From: "Anthony G. Basile" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up References: <555530C9.6060207@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 47bee482-65fe-438d-8d74-67d75b82955e X-Archives-Hash: 23149a3b9fb4b122fa133da46e52035f On 05/14/15 20:05, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jack Morgan wrote: >> My over >> plan is to reduce the total number of keyworded packages to a more >> maintainable level. > Many thanks. This is really the best possible solution. Arch teams > can stabilize packages at their discretion, and if they get in over > their heads they can de-stabilize at their discretion. This gives the > arch team the most control over their own workload and the experience > of their users, while not being a burden on package maintainers > either. > I'd like to add that ppc and ppc64 are also in a fairly healhty state healthy state now thanks to ago, jer, jmorgan and others. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA