[gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up

[gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up

[Jack Morgan]

I'm actively working on stablereq for sparc and ia64. It took some weeks 
to get my systems and process working. I hope to reduce the open 
bugzilla in the next several weeks. Please don't just drop stable 
keywords, even though the bugzilla has been open for a long time. I'd 
appreciate it if you could send me a quick email asking to do your 
package first, instead of just dropping the keyword. I'll put your 
request at the top of my queue.

Once I’m done with stablereq queue, I'll look to keywordreq queue. My 
over plan is to reduce the total number of keyworded packages to a more 
maintainable level. I'll send out more specific details for each arch 
this week. Any help is greatly appreciated


Thanks,

-- 
Jack Morgan
Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan <jmorgan@gentoo.org>>
Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B 761D 8E0A

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up

[Rich Freeman]

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jack Morgan <jmorgan@gentoo.org> wrote:
> My over
> plan is to reduce the total number of keyworded packages to a more
> maintainable level.

Many thanks.  This is really the best possible solution.  Arch teams
can stabilize packages at their discretion, and if they get in over
their heads they can de-stabilize at their discretion.  This gives the
arch team the most control over their own workload and the experience
of their users, while not being a burden on package maintainers
either.

-- 
Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up

[Anthony G. Basile]

On 05/14/15 20:05, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jack Morgan <jmorgan@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> My over
>> plan is to reduce the total number of keyworded packages to a more
>> maintainable level.
> Many thanks.  This is really the best possible solution.  Arch teams
> can stabilize packages at their discretion, and if they get in over
> their heads they can de-stabilize at their discretion.  This gives the
> arch team the most control over their own workload and the experience
> of their users, while not being a burden on package maintainers
> either.
>

I'd like to add that ppc and ppc64 are also in a fairly healhty state 
healthy state now thanks to ago, jer, jmorgan and others.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB  DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID  : F52D4BBA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up

[Pacho Ramos]

El jue, 14-05-2015 a las 16:33 -0700, Jack Morgan escribió:
> I'm actively working on stablereq for sparc and ia64. It took some weeks 
> to get my systems and process working. I hope to reduce the open 
> bugzilla in the next several weeks. Please don't just drop stable 
> keywords, even though the bugzilla has been open for a long time. I'd 
> appreciate it if you could send me a quick email asking to do your 
> package first, instead of just dropping the keyword. I'll put your 
> request at the top of my queue.
> 
> Once I’m done with stablereq queue, I'll look to keywordreq queue. My 
> over plan is to reduce the total number of keyworded packages to a more 
> maintainable level. I'll send out more specific details for each arch 
> this week. Any help is greatly appreciated
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Thanks a lot Jack :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc and Ia64 keyword clean up

[Mikle Kolyada]

15.05.2015 02:33, Jack Morgan пишет:
> I'm actively working on stablereq for sparc and ia64. It took some
> weeks to get my systems and process working. I hope to reduce the open
> bugzilla in the next several weeks. Please don't just drop stable
> keywords, even though the bugzilla has been open for a long time. I'd
> appreciate it if you could send me a quick email asking to do your
> package first, instead of just dropping the keyword. I'll put your
> request at the top of my queue.
>
> Once I’m done with stablereq queue, I'll look to keywordreq queue. My
> over plan is to reduce the total number of keyworded packages to a
> more maintainable level. I'll send out more specific details for each
> arch this week. Any help is greatly appreciated
>
>
> Thanks,
>
++

I went through some sparc STABLEREQs too.