From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCC7138CA4 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 278D0E07DF; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC4CE07D7 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (CPE002401f30b73-CM78cd8ec1b205.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34D1333BF44 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <553A91F6.7080505@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:56:54 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: c++14 global USE flag References: <20150424194217.0176adc0@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150424194217.0176adc0@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d2a6aa1c-fbc5-417e-ac34-65afb6b08579 X-Archives-Hash: ae89fcb8a0314d40b256a82923798279 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/04/15 02:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:12:32 +0300 Maxim Koltsov > wrote: >> Hello. My previous email was sent from the wrong address and it >> seems it did not make it into the list. Sending again from the >> right address... >> >> I'm introducing "c++14" use flag to every package in >> app-leechcraft catherogy via leechcraft.eclass. I need to put USE >> description somewhere. I propose / ask for permission to do it in >> global use.desc. Putting this flag to every single metadata.xml >> feels just wrong --- there are 72 of them now. >> >> Proposed description: "Build using C++ 14 standard" >> >> Looking forward for comments. > > This isn't going to be sustainable... What's the long-term plan > for dealing with this? > Sounds like we need to go through the archives and revisit the conversations about how to integrate c++11 , again.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlU6kfYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCDuQEAhAv0boCkTU3RvT5d/fX3la7V 8so0wqnPtHKI4fSqEwgA+wXmVlB14ykbTQ1VnrRR5WrEPRjMbm9V1MSXAA6MnC43 =i/3U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----