From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA3F138C9D for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08325E091E; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD83E086F for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.156] (unknown [195.254.219.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76A1D340BCD for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <55311BA1.4050906@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:41:37 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer? References: <552A625D.7030000@seismic.de> <1428844100.2041.166.camel@gentoo.org> <552A80E9.1010103@seismic.de> <201504121705.13255.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <552DDC18.3050304@seismic.de> <20150415130214.18559.qmail@stuge.se> <5530E162.2010409@gentoo.org> <20150417140030.2a4dc50e53bbebc8a77edef7@gentoo.org> <5530EB29.9030205@gentoo.org> <20150417152653.20f25fd7e411f7e2cc59f51b@gentoo.org> <55310178.2090404@gentoo.org> <20150417173349.2b4eef4151a3e45719be2bd5@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20150417173349.2b4eef4151a3e45719be2bd5@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 122b0b4f-0e16-4358-a241-4e69991af99f X-Archives-Hash: b630ea8518d0a50e0ee76a4c4c69e5d4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > The problem is double effort: previously one developer effort was > needed, now effort is doubled at least You have correctly identified the problem; in order to do things properly one must do things properly, which is more difficult than not doing things properly. On an unrelated side-note: I am considering a career in landscape portrait painting instead of computer science. - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlUxG6AACgkQRtClrXBQc7VmVQD9GyjKVdu4PWghoeJk/3vZJBe2 4C2zVdEP5B29B+RA07gA/0+UzuhetTYeKGjttkJNpTdHDeTjHJfKC26BK8tuYFPE =mm2P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----