From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC6B138A1A for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D0B3E092B; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4C3E089F for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (slava80.la.net.ua [176.36.150.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FE84340717 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54C1A91C.8010702@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:51:24 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl References: <53C12C21.6070605@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53C12C21.6070605@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 95e11343-9b0b-4bf2-84fa-1a8a4e735235 X-Archives-Hash: 1b2b9857cea89ea4e304f6e79aeb61a5 Regarding the last libav discussion I think we should also go with a "libressl" USE flag instead of creating a virtual that makes handling SUBSLOTs impossible.