From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: gnome <gnome@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Enable "gdk-pixbuf" in gnome sub-profiles
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 11:43:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54830461d894b321295ed4e6200bb46d92391ec6.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88c4207b21c2426bbaaf9e454f1fc4e5e7f332e4.camel@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1237 bytes --]
El dom, 04-08-2024 a las 00:44 +0300, Mart Raudsepp escribió:
> On Sat, 2024-08-03 at 16:04 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The rationale is briefly explained at:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/910363
> >
> > As gdk-pixbuf upstream is not including support for new formats,
> > people
> > usually need to manually enable "gdk-pixbuf" USE for important libs
> > such as libheif, libjxl, or libavif.
> >
> > At least for Gnome environments, I think that the USE could be
> > globally
> > enabled as gdk-pixbuf is used everywhere and the dependency will be
> > installed anyway.
> >
> > Any issues with enabling it for gnome profiles?
>
> gdk-pixbuf modules are a bit of an attack surface, so I feel a bit
> uneasy about enabling it by default globally. Per-package enabling
> (package.use) feels a bit safer to me.
> It's also not a global USE flag and is used with different meaning
> (e.g. in swaybg, rxvt-unicode, w3m), though that might be more of an
> argument for default enabling for all packages in gnome profiles, as
> gdk-pixbuf is there anyways.
>
>
> Mart
Yeah, because of what you state in the second paragraph I would also
opt for enabling it globally in gnome profiles :-/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-07 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-03 14:04 [gentoo-dev] Enable "gdk-pixbuf" in gnome sub-profiles Pacho Ramos
2024-08-03 21:44 ` Mart Raudsepp
2024-08-07 9:43 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54830461d894b321295ed4e6200bb46d92391ec6.camel@gentoo.org \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=gnome@gentoo.org \
--cc=leio@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox