From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8263B1389E2 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5433CE0843; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sporkbox.us (sporkbox.us [107.150.19.126]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E1EE07EC for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.144] (110.63-135-139.cellcom.com [63.135.139.110]) by sporkbox.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AE9080009 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:17:42 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <547FFC85.8070306@sporkbox.us> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:17:41 -0600 From: Daniel Campbell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs References: <54728711.4050909@gentoo.org> <5472A11A.1040101@sporkbox.us> <20141126091517.GA10014@ofire> <5476F421.4060201@sporkbox.us> <547F3B7E.4020805@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <547F3B7E.4020805@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 41942d94-7952-4490-9f3b-0cff8d491794 X-Archives-Hash: 054f703583f7d3ccc4e36d8255bc26d7 On 12/03/2014 10:34 AM, Harvey wrote: > If your going to take on spacefm, it would be great if you also handled > udevil since they are both from the same upstream repo and work tightly > together.. > > I'm an avid user of both, and since upstream is no longer maintained on > either of these their futures are unclear.. > > H > On 11/27/2014 04:51 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 11/26/2014 03:15 AM, Yixun Lan wrote: >>> On 21:08 Sun 23 Nov , Daniel Campbell wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to take x11-misc/spacefm if a developer is willing to allow >>>> me to proxy-maint until I become a developer. >>> >>> update metadata.xml, using your email found in bugzie. >>> and current no bug opened, thanks >>> >>> btw, any particular reason why should we keep so many stable versions? >>> probably start doing by cleaning old versions ;-) >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> Version: GnuPG v2 >>>> >>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUcqEYAAoJEJUrb08JgYgHJ0IIAK+tguKdL+JxdjKLySOSJaTU >>>> kiU1z2rBqUfPzs8VI3V8JAAL9dbSJel4h3/JdoZFpidC9jED63l5STmGXi6dp63O >>>> 9CKqNQRt4AELfOUpQzxoD4HNHVxaA9hkiiJXgAoF9HIfKBEqczPCBKGnJb5s1WB5 >>>> 8eQkn6t6DZMZeRV/dE6pw1RgTj1eHowu2es67V7+bHMiy2ylz5/4ru0dx+1UHvU1 >>>> UeBBcB1IesAVxVsfpBLJoi+aZA9CO9EAriaGogzTXQPP5odr4bgIf5acxOPKGxt0 >>>> iz62j/XgG3jTExqkP5rNaTVnO9ZZol8XPcLiAIZTEl79XU0ZOcy5LDUsJNY+9cI= >>>> =stIL >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >> >> I'd do that myself, if I was a dev. :P I'd need a developer to help me >> proxy maintain it. I've been meaning to become a developer, but my >> ebuild quiz is out of date and I have a lot of IRL things going on right >> now so I can't really work toward it right now. spacefm's developer is >> on hiatus, so it'd be a good low-traffic package for me to maintain and >> take the load (if only mental) off of other developers. >> >> > > > Sure, I'm down to proxy-maintain udevil as well. I use it with spacefm to mount things.