From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-68518-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B54138A1C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:37:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F887E0976;
	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F76E0970
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r20so10511015wiv.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:36:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=kU3EC/I/BeD2xua4A4Ik11RZ0nrn7VCU7YhGXyQSNd4=;
        b=0LdNJ77Lqonnm6LFl8vZakvkkswXfurbvx5pDHn2VDpCPERgdliT/ZSqmdSpvMIyUA
         Gn4IDJsoRt8d95TWNyF4QLt43IXR8rvBgVESYeJlHkSyZyOL5mLZmF1w/EJHnFkhUHha
         fVMLqOt2liBEPWPtQhdTfA3R5iyL7GG6jSJqUe/YLeilzSFJwUNug2t0AD7IOQssQXFy
         gk6e0P3TGneFkcV4S8qVx7aSJHcFDrxI7Rdugn9jcLwaCpbwbpJcweUM7EdioRXVBMwS
         Tpe6R82gCm+YM35y+NQx/LQ51zhH6u0fGAR1On80GKKJOXCeiTdOZd9o3VerBEvwHj0X
         /Haw==
X-Received: by 10.194.79.199 with SMTP id l7mr11291506wjx.136.1416443800980;
        Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1418:100:558::2? (cl-1369.trn-01.it.sixxs.net. [2001:1418:100:558::2])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ga1sm1753183wib.1.2014.11.19.16.36.39
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <546D377B.4070609@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:36:11 +0100
From: "vivo75@gmail.com" <vivo75@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed
 model
References: <54665115.3060706@gentoo.org>	<54675866.1080506@gentoo.org>	<m47m46$lov$1@ger.gmane.org>	<CAGfcS_=q3YWaqYCCSL9E-KEedHneDrun95WagPLmyvmGRf0vGw@mail.gmail.com>	<54676A96.4080803@gentoo.org>	<5467B79E.30507@gentoo.org>	<86y4r99ov4.fsf@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp>	<546B45DA.1030401@gentoo.org>	<546CAAED.2080200@gentoo.org>	<546CD2FD.3040602@gentoo.org>	<546CD93D.6060209@gentoo.org> <20141120010017.5263cf40@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20141120010017.5263cf40@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 11c31368-52a8-47da-b195-ad050d3dc145
X-Archives-Hash: 2a1d6c26cd06bdb622ae904e37b81ec6

Il 20/11/2014 01:00, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:54:05 +0100
> hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> At that point it is forked. I don't see what's wrong with forking.
> Forking wouldn't be the problem. Duplication of effort would be the
> problem.
>
>
>      jer
>
worse, mutually incompatibility would be much worse