From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd profiles
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:19:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54075B96.8000908@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140903181114.GA14334@linux1>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 03/09/14 02:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 09:45:23AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> A possible solution is to remove it in the next version of
>> openrc, as it is deprecated already. Another solution is to ask
>> the Council to let somebody apply patches if the maintainer is
>> unresponsive, set a deadline, etc.
>
> The problem is we have two different API's. Gentoo's API for tools
> that do not involve booting, and OpenRC's API. In the past, they
> were identical, but that isn't the case now.
>
> That is why I haven't removed /etc/init.d/functions.sh. That is
> actually part of OpenRC's public API now.
>
> I can deprecate it. To do so, I would need to have it print out a
> deprecation warning that would be wrong for Gentoo in the next
> release.
>
> That warning would have to tell users to source
> /lib*/rc/sh/functions.sh.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> William
>
I thought the whole point of the gentoo-functions package was for it
to take over the /etc/init.d/functions.sh shortcut??
As far as I am aware (and i believe vapier will confirm),
/etc/init.d/functions.sh is and shall always remain part of the Gentoo
API, despite /etc/init.d/ now being the realm of openrc proper. This
was part of the discussion over a year ago when the decision was made
to implement the pure-bash gentoo-functions.sh replacement in the
first place, and why that symlink didn't disappear back then.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iF0EAREIAAYFAlQHW5YACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDligD9HBwLjLpgS/h9KQZzlBPCAENK
6K/X5Mnvi64fYINtebQA90Hu3GDJUHhOTG3it4ThoHphXdCd1Y3/TmutSnbDYDs=
=RJUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-03 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-29 23:09 [gentoo-dev] systemd profiles Jauhien Piatlicki
2014-08-29 23:27 ` Alex Xu
2014-08-30 2:41 ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-30 9:09 ` Jauhien Piatlicki
2014-08-30 11:27 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-08-30 11:41 ` Michał Górny
2014-08-30 12:03 ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-30 12:55 ` Lars Wendler
2014-08-30 13:45 ` Rich Freeman
2014-09-03 18:11 ` William Hubbs
2014-09-03 18:19 ` Ian Stakenvicius [this message]
2014-09-03 18:45 ` William Hubbs
2014-09-03 19:27 ` Rich Freeman
2014-09-10 3:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2014-08-30 12:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " J. Roeleveld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54075B96.8000908@gentoo.org \
--to=axs@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox