On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 9:29:53 AM EDT Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
> 
> Here's a series of patches for GLEP 63 (key policies).  The first three
> patches are merely editorial changes.  The fourth is an actual
> recommended policy change.
> 
> The editorial changes are:
> 
> 1. Using 'OpenPGP' instead of 'GPG' where appropriate.
> 
> 2. Replacing 'RSAv4' with more correct term.
> 
> 3. Clarifying the sentence on minimal key requirement to make it clear
>    that dedicated signing subkey is also part of it.
> 
> The policy change is changing the recommendation from RSA-4096
> to RSA-2048.  This does not require developers to reroll their RSA-4096
> keys but aims to prevent people unnecessarily replacing RSA-2048 with
> RSA-4096.
> 
> The new recommendation matches what GnuPG FAQ suggests [1] (see 11.4,
> 11.5).  Long story short, RSA-4096 is only a little stronger than
> RSA-2048 while it is much slower.  If someone really wants to use it,
> sure; but generally we shouldn't be encouraging people to use it.
> 
> [1]:https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#no_default_of_rsa4096
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Michał Górny
> 
> Michał Górny (4):
>   glep-0063: Use 'OpenPGP' as appropriate
>   glep-0063: RSAv4 -> OpenPGP v4 key format
>   glep-0063: Clarify dedicated signing subkey in minimal reqs
>   glep-0063: Change the recommended RSA key size to 2048 bits
> 
>  glep-0063.rst | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Patches look good to me.  I think now would be a good time to address other 
verbage too.  e.g. recommendations should be requirements etc