From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-67091-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2932613877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:29:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80CF3E085B;
	Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:29:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from email.aon.at (smtpout01.highway.telekom.at [195.3.96.112])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F58CE0837
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 4882 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2014 17:29:24 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on
	WARSBL607.highway.telekom.at
X-Spam-Level: 
Received: from 194-166-9-220.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO [10.0.0.2]) ([194.166.9.220])
          (envelope-sender <haubi@gentoo.org>)
          by smarthub83.res.a1.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP; 30 Jul 2014 17:29:24 -0000
X-A1Mail-Track-Id: 1406741362:4670:smarthub83:194.166.9.220:1
Message-ID: <53D92B72.7000004@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:29:22 +0200
From: Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265:
 x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild
References: <20140727190116.B09072004E@flycatcher.gentoo.org>	<53D5F0A5.5090908@gentoo.org>	<CA+CSuAJiQpsGqH-g-p_w6JiD-DezqJ6EJaNAXVVwdv9LNH4W8Q@mail.gmail.com>	<pan$bda7d$e50034f1$78b6bf04$b2a47f8d@cox.net>	<CA+CSuAJNXgZ+LHT3AgPv6yQyJG-w-KdtxUiwhKc9Ey7eRtq0Eg@mail.gmail.com>	<pan$a78bc$5cf250f0$78c422d6$736518e4@cox.net> <20140730134837.105a747c@gentp.lnet> <53D8E60F.8010305@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <53D8E60F.8010305@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: b8461bd0-5b2f-4f77-aabf-b183959998b0
X-Archives-Hash: 84f6353e72ee5bdcd409719ae190db63


Am 2014-07-30 14:33, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
> 
> There is no need to package.mask if proper if -logic is used, like, for
> example,
> 
> if [[ ${PV} == 9999* ]]; then
> inherit git-r3
> KEYWORDS=""
> else
> KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86"
> fi
> 
> Then you can just `cp foo-9999.ebuild foo-1.2.3.ebuild` and it'll have
> the KEYWORDS
> ready, and 1.2.3 and 9999 ebuilds can be identical

Which instance of the KEYWORDS line is touched by the ekeyword tool these days?

To have ekeyword touch the else-part in the release ebuild, what about this:

if [[ ${PV} == 9999* ]]; then
  inherit vcs...
  :; KEYWORDS=""
else
  KEYWORDS="..."
fi

/haubi/