From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A012113877A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7F1DE0853; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAE2FE083D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94B6E340180 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53D8C885.8040804@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 06:27:17 -0400 From: "Anthony G. Basile" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Restructuring the ppc/ppc64 profiles to be better multilib References: <53AF0D93.7070405@opensource.dyc.edu> <20140730043451.GA25068@toyama.bonyari.local> In-Reply-To: <20140730043451.GA25068@toyama.bonyari.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f36c27b7-4100-4e26-8e58-9947aeb0e731 X-Archives-Hash: c38de3e3aa42518d8a14ca00bf5294e6 On 07/30/14 00:34, Jack Morgan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is a ppc/ppc64 issues, but I'm sending this to gentoo-dev@ because >> it seems to me that those herds are pretty scattered right: >> >> 1) The issue came up about restructuring the arch/powerpc profiles. >> There we have some ancient stuff like ppc64/32ul. I don't know why >> that's needed and it doesn't make much sense wrt the new direction >> multilib is going. I'd like to clean up those profiles. Any objections >> to removing ppc64/32ul, coalescing ppc64/64ul into just ppc64 and making >> whatever other tweaks are needed? >> >> 2) Can we try to get the ppc/ppc64 herds communicating more. I don't >> believe every team needs a lead but at least have a point of reference >> so we can communicate. > > What is the status of this? I've been away for a few months but am back > now. Do you need help with this? > > > Thanks, I did not proceed because there was no response from any ppc/ppc64 members. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA