From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74A613877A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42BA8E0FAC; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60935E0F51 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (assk.torservers.net [78.108.63.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D7CD33FB3E for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53D4E92E.8040301@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:57:34 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com> <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> <53CE6CED.1060300@gentoo.org> <20140723004441.2e68c0b0@gentoo.org> <53D26D58.3000004@gentoo.org> <53D27343.6020009@gentoo.org> <20140726134907.621d8892@googlemail.com> <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org> <53D4E893.2090804@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53D4E893.2090804@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d8dea813-d694-4981-8dbe-20e0087623e3 X-Archives-Hash: cffefdc4c1bb92be8d72e859aae6c328 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr.": > On 7/27/14, 1:42 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, >> simple-scan and something else >> >> So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. >> >> People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take >> those races anyday over an regression that causes >> endless rebuilding... > > I think this really boils down to deciding on the tradeoff between > correctness and speed. > > Even the example above shows that with dynamic rebuilds some manual > rebuilds were needed, which I interpret as dynamic deps not being correct. > > Static deps go the other way around: they do lead to more rebuilds, and > I think no one is denying that. However, they seem more predictable to me. > > Paweł > his argument is pointless, because he got static deps on all those ebuilds now anyway