From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66966-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AFA13877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95D61E0EDD;
	Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B008AE0DCA
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:50:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (assk.torservers.net [78.108.63.46])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20DCC33FF4D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:50:49 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53D4E793.8010302@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:50:43 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org>	<201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>	<20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com>	<1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org>	<53CE6CED.1060300@gentoo.org>	<20140723004441.2e68c0b0@gentoo.org>	<53D26D58.3000004@gentoo.org>	<53D27343.6020009@gentoo.org>	<slrnlt78fa.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de> <20140726134907.621d8892@googlemail.com> <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 709e8062-f3d4-4d19-a002-5d68674dbda3
X-Archives-Hash: ba508a022752987c6669b92f4772bd96

Samuli Suominen:
> 
> On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC)
>> Martin Vaeth <martin@mvath.de> wrote:
>>> hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g.
>>>> when subslots are in use)
>>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken.
>> Yes they are.
> 
> We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision
> bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs]
> to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev
> Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post,
> nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode
> Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages,
> simple-scan and something else
> 
> So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature.
> 
> People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take
> those races anyday over an regression that causes
> endless rebuilding...
> 

I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support
on most of those converted ebuilds.