From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0EF13877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2BE5E0DF5; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC62E0DD3 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (chomsky.torservers.net [77.247.181.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C099F34009D for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53D3BDEF.408@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:40:47 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <20140726152211.064b6bd8@googlemail.com> <20140726153624.55f82edf@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140726153624.55f82edf@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 850da6eb-04c5-40d6-9d48-c10350c653b8 X-Archives-Hash: df38a753326c7094b463839926c34b0f Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:33:38 +0000 (UTC) > Martin Vaeth wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>>> No. PMS does not specify which dependency information has >>>> to be taken. >>> >>> Yes it does. Please read PMS, and do not guess as to what it says. >> >> Looking for /var/db/pkg gave exactly one hit: >> The assertion that this is *not* part of PMS. >> >> The section on dependencies is only about the ebuild format. >> >> So either it is very hidden or not in there. > > I said read PMS, not grep PMS. You're making all kinds of wild claims > based upon what you guess PMS says, not what it actually says. > This looks like a private lesson in PMS reading. Can you guys do that on IRC?