From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B02D13877A for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C213E1B8E; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529BDE1B88 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (107.4.189.109.customer.cdi.no [109.189.4.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA145340100 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53D27D69.2060701@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:53:13 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com> <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> <20140723143325.031947fb@googlemail.com> <20140725160110.1da35b93@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140725160110.1da35b93@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4ba07bb4-85e6-48c2-b64b-61b3ef5232eb X-Archives-Hash: 1f343c0411246a6295e039e5a26c3389 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 25/07/14 17:01, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > The reason everything is such a mess at the moment is precisely > because we've accumulated so much "good enough" and "not thinking > your cunning plan all the way through" that nothing is actually > correct any more. It's one thing to get away with this > occasionally, but quite another to build an entire system upon it. > We can't afford more mistakes, and we have to actively fix existing > ones. This is my position as well. - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlPSfWkACgkQRtClrXBQc7XOcwD/Vmzd/B4IysGbczDAxI/X6CLw miOuIePVOSwIWRSMvx4A/0Kdy6SCxx2JCko9xMTcnAagqaoleWJeoPIwb1bUkE74 =2rq+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----