From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9625D13877A for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCAA7E0EE2; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DF4E0E94 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-5d6a80-173.dhcp.inet.fi [93.106.128.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8038B3400CF for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53CEA03F.50401@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:32:47 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <53CE219B.8030400@sumptuouscapital.com> <1406021105.1013.23.camel@gentoo.org> <20140722181122.224c723c@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140722181122.224c723c@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: efb41f24-725e-472d-b755-300d6f09c95c X-Archives-Hash: 0f1754156258e3f1e2bf51b096171b6a On 22/07/14 20:11, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:03:16 +0200 > Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> As someone who regularly adds in dependencies without bumping (adding >> USE=selinux dependencies to the proper SELinux policy) because that >> would trigger lots of totally unnecessary rebuilds: > Er... You do realise that doing that with dynamic dependencies leads to > packages depending upon selinux that don't actually use selinux, right? > Thus triggering lots of totally unnecessary rebuilds on an ABI change. > Err, I believe he meant adding RDEPEND -only USE="selinux" to pull in eg. sec-policy/selinux-dante from net-proxy/dante So, how does that exactly make "packages depending upon selinux that don't actually use selinux" Doesn't make any sense - Samuli