From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CC613877A for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2594CE0AB7; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA70E09F5 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (107.4.189.109.customer.cdi.no [109.189.4.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC57B33BE06 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53CE3206.8040505@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 11:42:30 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721225642.56aee8ed@pomiot.lan> <53CD8269.3050808@gentoo.org> <20140721225251.GA22854@linux1> <53CDB213.6040502@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53CDB213.6040502@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 912a80fb-53e1-4050-9d32-5d303e234182 X-Archives-Hash: fe6b609c38dda6f6b132010e92a56822 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 22/07/14 02:36, hasufell wrote: > William Hubbs: >> My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is >> that the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then >> have to hit the arch teams, which we know are overworked anyway, >> with stable requests just because we changed the dependencies. >> Isn't that causing a lot of possibly unnecessary work for our >> arch teams? > Procedure over logic? > > Just commit it straight to arch if repoman doesn't complain. William, this is, as Julian pointed out, a problem you can solve by changing your policies. This is not a problem related to the Portage software, in which dynamic-deps are broken. - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlPOMgYACgkQRtClrXBQc7VuuwD/UNQzX5aHSBbfXhyYRxH4oYzK N9aEf88WLVJK2JVKJBkA/iDF6ozQ9I0WKWpi/jvZa/W7yxKeZsXu5ACa5mbgM88+ =9/RG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----