From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5882A13877A for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41F07E0B76; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57FE7E0B58 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (87-205-244-98.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.244.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24105340020 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53CE11F9.8020700@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:25:45 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="t55o2AOrJpNqXpHaXRE6m96OJgLlReaKh" X-Archives-Salt: a0dff9a1-c906-4b83-a433-f7b4fd5a0996 X-Archives-Hash: b0bb47ec13767c0df82821037a6d1659 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --t55o2AOrJpNqXpHaXRE6m96OJgLlReaKh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/21/14, 11:52 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > Micha=C5=82 has documented the shortcomings of dynamic deps in our wiki= [0]. > (Thank you!) This documentation also includes two of our possible > solutions. > > [0] Thank you, this is very useful. I didn't understand the issue much before reading that page. One question: why for "Removal of a USE flag along with the relevant dependencies" dynamic deps say "revbump + unnecessary rebuild"? What would happen without the revbump? > 1. Improve dynamic-deps. This is, as Micha=C5=82 pointed out earlier in= > this thread a pipe dream. Agreed. > 2. Remove dynamic-deps. This is what I think currently makes sense. +1 I also think it's the best option. Pawe=C5=82 --t55o2AOrJpNqXpHaXRE6m96OJgLlReaKh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTzhIAAAoJEE8aJVXqcZkduI4P/jz8eMzc4YrK1Y7LYNqdjg7+ fYepq6bpRfEX2XyfG5LEJfs/MqFyIebGdd699JKnLxbXmyZ1dgB0t4zlxryPE/j/ UwcmNhkT0g2Qdy/Pn1O76NE0OSXT49zRkXjj2bEcuTVSAhgTC82xZnfdn7k/my92 a+PGrL6qY8vLNEg+u3yiLcNa3Oj5c2JCzIIvQ9Z6CrKkM7IU2kTqioYJXqqRLVMq K5IJIX+03C9mQbKV1HnFjsk/SybWGsxhKHxYdWXj8mgfpPoEDlFIU8ikAK3//+9r se3ZzamlOHl0Bod3HEcQXj5CI0hpSg8WkjmK2/6VTzgyyfXzzgI0lpAgZjEU759y F5i1ZEaCk1DxNbHf3v+26IcR/AlXoXJiVM67MBT+e8BglhtKTCMdbn1VIaQ6IPYx qkNnhjacyw78klpRd+DrIC6LXdH/PU5ZwAXvqddDeZZx2Wv/kDgNJGy1SR0kx7wD okE5/ryZhHpW7TP1pItVNg6StghrsOlXI0ezksPvtwqJfTgCrlU0ej5u8NseI7V+ SrUnR4AiFC3kB0ECnq8d7IELVuqG+n0rdulJzJ1XR4TkK+IIywb3Ex5PvNTlik4B y741keXITwUL4YTpvA4VdH9cucmn/se/kdYS7N6Cafy3Ha2QtxFuckyktFNkBQyW 4WhMkcmIw2HXtydbEzPy =OmaA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t55o2AOrJpNqXpHaXRE6m96OJgLlReaKh--