From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66734-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A513877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33A71E0C5F;
	Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40A0CE0C39
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:36:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (tor-exit0-readme.dfri.se [171.25.193.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2163833FD85
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53CDB213.6040502@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:36:35 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721225642.56aee8ed@pomiot.lan> <53CD8269.3050808@gentoo.org> <20140721225251.GA22854@linux1>
In-Reply-To: <20140721225251.GA22854@linux1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 1b478c85-8362-44f9-aa25-41b7c99efd2d
X-Archives-Hash: 8e68256a8dbe8bd104cf63b338247bba

William Hubbs:
> I'm picking a random msg to reply to.
> 
> My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is that
> the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then have to hit
> the arch teams, which we know are overworked anyway, with stable
> requests just because we changed the dependencies. Isn't that causing a
> lot of possibly unnecessary work for our arch teams?
> 

Procedure over logic?

Just commit it straight to arch if repoman doesn't complain.