From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871A71392EF for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA831E0B52; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E5BE09D2 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (CPE002401f30b73-CM78cd8ec1b205.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D369833F52C for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53CD7455.7020606@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:13:09 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> <20140721205041.185f2a85@googlemail.com> <53CD72BE.3090607@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53CD72BE.3090607@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: dca0ba06-5575-4041-b52c-668de3b4d8dd X-Archives-Hash: b89084ae0ce2895831a161394c3b0a05 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 21/07/14 04:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 Samuli Suominen >> wrote: >>> people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like >>> EAPI4->5 >> EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes >> confusion if anyone has a USE dependency upon your package. >> > > What kind of confusion? In my experience, Portage handles it > well > Says the guy that's emerging things with --nodeps most of the time... :D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlPNdFUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAtHgD/YIrBc6LpzTRXm2lxWWSEXkUo Wp6IM5mIthE1+0DepsYA/jTG85TGSHF7R326e8eaAlr02FT2g7M47wMjOLzzsvB/ =nDEq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----