From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040AD1392EF for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D00F3E09E4; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE51CE091A for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-5d6a80-173.dhcp.inet.fi [93.106.128.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 217FB33F14F for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53CD72BE.3090607@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:06:22 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> <20140721205041.185f2a85@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140721205041.185f2a85@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a7408bdb-98e1-4492-aa12-942773ba8c8f X-Archives-Hash: c7040cd7793064fa9157c5de63d498fc On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like EAPI4->5 > EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes > confusion if anyone has a USE dependency upon your package. > What kind of confusion? In my experience, Portage handles it well