From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320E313877A for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5762BE0854; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791FFE0819 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p5B3B8C2D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.59.140.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1127033EEE2; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53CA7415.1030903@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:35:17 +0200 From: Thomas Sachau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: enlightenment@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent to need to change all keywords at the same time References: <1405600131.895.14.camel@gentoo.org> <53C83CAC.9060006@gentoo.org> <1405671248.1667.1.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1405671248.1667.1.camel@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eKlPKUVL3TfwUevwNt5wKiR205bEXIR8x" X-Archives-Salt: d3db8335-3402-419a-9573-fdfb2368fa71 X-Archives-Hash: 297076c1a5c46eaadc95624181b0541e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eKlPKUVL3TfwUevwNt5wKiR205bEXIR8x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pacho Ramos schrieb: > El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 23:14 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribi=C3=B3: >> Pacho Ramos schrieb: >>> I recently noticed this: >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D502836 >>> >>> imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches as >>> KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE=3D"release". That has= an >>> important drawback as forces all arches to be done at the same time a= nd, >>> since some are much slower than others, forces all to wait for them. >>> And, as that can depend on even more stabilizations (like it's the ca= se) >>> all that bugs blocking the stabilization need to also be done for *al= l* >>> arches before. >>> >>> I am not sure if any policy exists for this, but I would forbid to ma= ke >>> this due this issue. I would instead move to use KEYWORDS en ebuild a= s >>> done usually. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> >>> >> >> You know that a KEYWORDS variable set in the ebuild after the inherit >> line does overwrite anything set by the eclass? >> So i dont really see, what the issue here actually should be. >> >=20 > Should we start setting KEWORDS in imlib2 ebuild then? (for example for= > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D502836 ) In that case, what i= s > the advantage for setting it in eclass too? >=20 >=20 >=20 You obviously already did it, but yes, my suggestion is to set the KEYWORDS variable in the ebuild. The advantage for setting it in the eclass is in my eyes mostly for development in overlays (efl 1.7 libs and e17 have been in the overlay for a long time), since there are no arch teams to stabilize, so it is easier to set it based on the version then to manually adjust all keywords for each ebuild. --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --eKlPKUVL3TfwUevwNt5wKiR205bEXIR8x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/ iJwEAQECAAYFAlPKdBoACgkQG7kqcTWJkGc/LAQAy5h4bHmT14XWC+fOh9Rg2UGw tEBHd/nM6Ovh73b5by/T+OhyngYtGAvzO/UXSWtUCCHVI80zbCKBmRrhd+3Jblcl DoSgkpx52Nq3t83XCPX6k9mbImtf/TENc+PmaoSvmnsu7WP+KOUuC3JtGWlFn0bI UA3I/yuE5oNCYyMl4b4= =guyB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eKlPKUVL3TfwUevwNt5wKiR205bEXIR8x--