From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68F813877A for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD434E09A9; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EDFE094E for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-bcee39-235.dhcp.inet.fi [188.238.57.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C5F234023D for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53C8F241.6090106@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:09:05 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent to need to change all keywords at the same time References: <1405600131.895.14.camel@gentoo.org> <53C7D916.2040709@gentoo.org> <20140717170350.5be87e4e@googlemail.com> <1405621727.19699.2.camel@gentoo.org> <53C81C5A.7000202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53C81C5A.7000202@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 802aae74-0b3e-493c-b29d-1e020f5fa8dd X-Archives-Hash: 42b51a2212eb95b993c447b8d49fc7e1 On 17/07/14 21:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > I guess we'll have to wait until vapier's back to get it done, tho.. > > imlib2 is basically normal autotools based package, there is no need to tie it to this specific eclass it should be extremely trivial to revision bump it to use normal eutils, autotools, econf, emake and so forth the only reason it's tied to this specific eclass is historical reasons i really can't see anyone objecting the conversion at this time - samuli