From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DBF13877A for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 04:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2833E08C8; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 04:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75E1E08B1 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 04:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-bcee62-190.dhcp.inet.fi [188.238.98.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6F0C33FB2C for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 04:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53BCBD4A.3020909@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:55:54 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy References: <20140707234502.3009929a@pomiot.lan> <20140708133859.3bc01349@pomiot.lan> <53BC0CCA.4000702@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e33c631c-3223-4e78-8756-3c1ce8254b2f X-Archives-Hash: e4a46565609c0bfbfb05eb24291044f9 On 08/07/14 19:17, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 07/09/2014 01:22 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> And some personal thoughts about the initial proposal... >> I don't care about the suggestion 3. in mgorny's proposal at all, but 1. >> and 2. should definately >> stay as is. > What authority does the game team have over anything? Did it get special > blessing from the Council? Isn't it just another regular project as per > GLEP 39? > > > Not everything we have had since-always-standing is documented, unfortunately -- games has always been special from others Still, even if it's undocumented, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist It's like the amd64/x86 stabilization exception that everyone who can test them can mark them, "everyone" knew it existed but it wasn't documented properly Sure, we should drive to getting everything documented, to avoid thesekind of confusions with newer people... - Samuli