From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EBA13877A for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A376CE08D9; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6107E083A for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-bcee53-57.dhcp.inet.fi [188.238.83.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8249F33FEEF for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53BA9BF8.9080605@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:09:12 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is || ( Atom... ) broken? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 42c553be-e167-4c5d-8c67-d1daf14db3b0 X-Archives-Hash: b556389b8ae1d49c0901d7e00910c2ec On 07/07/14 13:14, Greg Turner wrote: > WTF is up with it? Why does it love the first Atom so much more than > the others? > > It could be such a useful feature, but, in practice, it just never > seems to do what I want it to. Is it a bug? > > -gmt short answer, yes, specially in latest ~arch sys-apps/portage, see: http://bugs.gentoo.org/515230