public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:44:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B1BE15.4070209@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140630211446.2ae5cd98@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 30/06/14 03:14 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:40:19 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 30/06/14 11:36 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 2014-06-30, o godz. 11:22:07 Ian Stakenvicius
>>> <axs@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>>> 
>>>> Here's a great example of this -- dev-libs/nss-3.16-r1 is 
>>>> p.masked by me for testing, because when I converted it to 
>>>> multilib i needed to change the way it does some internal
>>>> ABI determination tests, and although I know it does work
>>>> fine on multilib-amd64 and (non-multilib) x86, I am not
>>>> confident without more testing that it will work for
>>>> cross-compiles or other non-multilib arches.  As such, it
>>>> -is- in the tree, but I've masked it until I can test it
>>>> myself in these circumstances or find someone else that can
>>>> do it for me.
>>> 
>>> But... if you unmask it, someone will test it and report
>>> whether it works :P.
>>> 
> 
>> But... if I unmask it, -everyone- using ~arch will install it
>> and it'll break all the systems that it doesn't work on, which
>> -could- be quite a lot at this point.  :D
> 
> Setting up an overlay for this and poking a stick at a few
> developers to try it out could help as an intermediary test, to
> ensure that you don't break every ~arch user in the progress.
> Better than "all or nothing"...
> 
> 

Or i can just use the same stick to poke them about the p.masked
version in the tree. :)

All of this just means, to me, that as long as the packages indeed are
actively being pursued for testing, I think it's still fine to use
package.mask.  However, if things aren't being actively tested (ie
they've been forgotten about) then probably whomever added the mask
should be pinged relentlessly about it until it's resolved one way or
another.  At least, I would find it perfectly acceptable to being
pinged on any mask I've left rotting in the tree.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlOxvhUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBqfQD/b4Rj0qoczFNwQO6jfnQjkL74
wFvxDV4SvER3BOyZRKkBAK5C63zG0YEAZvpfYTd6CwNLeX4cNdZXuVyMTqbPhx5k
=DbOV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-30 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-30  4:01 [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch William Hubbs
2014-06-30  6:04 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2014-06-30 18:51   ` [OT] " Tom Wijsman
2014-06-30  8:12 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-06-30 18:57   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-30 11:29 ` hasufell
2014-06-30 14:11   ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2014-06-30 14:37   ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-30 15:27     ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-06-30 19:49       ` Joshua Kinard
2014-06-30 20:36         ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-07-02 10:10     ` Peter Stuge
2014-06-30 13:25 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-30 14:15   ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-06-30 14:48     ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-30 19:11       ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-30 19:19         ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-02 17:56           ` Tom Wijsman
2014-07-02 18:04             ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-01 12:41     ` Patrick Lauer
2014-07-01 13:48       ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-05 21:08     ` Greg KH
2014-07-06 13:07       ` hasufell
2014-07-06 19:30         ` William Hubbs
2014-06-30 15:22   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-06-30 15:36     ` Michał Górny
2014-06-30 15:40       ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-06-30 16:13         ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-06-30 16:32           ` William Hubbs
2014-06-30 17:07             ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-30 17:49               ` William Hubbs
2014-06-30 19:18             ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-30 16:40           ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-30 16:55             ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-06-30 19:14         ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-30 19:44           ` Ian Stakenvicius [this message]
2014-07-02 17:58             ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-30 21:11         ` Roy Bamford
2014-06-30 20:01   ` Joshua Kinard
2014-06-30 20:50 ` Roy Bamford
2014-08-01  9:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2014-08-01 15:19   ` William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53B1BE15.4070209@gentoo.org \
    --to=axs@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox