From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66281-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFA613877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:18:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CB53E0B6C;
	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:18:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49A1E07BA
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:18:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (s1.x-taze.pl [195.154.13.114])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA29633F839
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53A05C45.3050400@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:18:29 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference
References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org>	<1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier>	<20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>	<31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier>	<20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>	<539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org>	<539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org>	<539EF323.7020208@gentoo.org>	<1402944163.8309.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>	<539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> <20140616214257.096c93fc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <539F49C2.6090008@gentoo.org> <539F4DFA.7020706@gentoo.org> <539F5288.1000000@gentoo.org> <539F5AB5.7000006@gentoo.org> <539F6B3C.7030807@gentoo.org> <539F8000.5080804@gentoo.org> <539F9E41.9050505@gentoo.org> <539FA536.3010401@gentoo.org> <53A034F4.2000900@gentoo.org> <53A04AF6.9010106@gentoo.org> <53A052EE.4020702@gentoo.org> <53A0587F.8000408@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <53A0587F.8000408@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 42af4aea-3826-473e-9247-ffde4d1fec01
X-Archives-Hash: da1e7b816f2b216df666dddc427cc57e

Joshua Kinard:
>> I have proposed numerous ways to communicate this problem to the user
>> without touching any of the precious toolchain/embedded packages. If no
>> one responds there, I'll just pick one and apply it.
> 
> And what I am trying to tell you is that making hardmask threats don't solve
> the core problem.

You missed my response to rich then.