From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665EB13877A for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD51AE0B55; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E834EE0B3E for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (tor-exit2-readme.dfri.se [171.25.193.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDB9433F82B for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53A052EE.4020702@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:38:38 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org> <1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier> <20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier> <20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> <539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org> <539EF323.7020208@gentoo.org> <1402944163.8309.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> <20140616214257.096c93fc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <539F49C2.6090008@gentoo.org> <539F4DFA.7020706@gentoo.org> <539F5288.1000000@gentoo.org> <539F5AB5.7000006@gentoo.org> <539F6B3C.7030807@gentoo.org> <539F8000.5080804@gentoo.org> <539F9E41.9050505@gentoo.org> <539FA536.3010401@gentoo.org> <53A034F4.2000900@gentoo.org> <53A04AF6.9010106@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53A04AF6.9010106@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 14e2c712-dfe6-48e9-8f41-c8bbcb60e42e X-Archives-Hash: 66c5f1d6aaa910004bb083f9d150c37c Joshua Kinard: > > "upstream" didn't say anywhere in that bug that they weren't interested. > They countered your reasoning with a technical argument. QA even states > that you need to file separate bugs for the various build failures. You > could set up a master TRACKER bug for these crossdev-related issues, and > then link in any existing bugs or create new ones tied to it, and that way, > you have things documented. > I appreciate that you want to help, but I'm not sure how many times I have to explain to you that the PATH idea was neglected by the embedded gentoo project lead. Check the history of this thread, it starts here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux.gentoo.dev/KZykx1DAJyM/YCMVUt4CzjUJ So again, I am not doing work that goes diametral to what the project lead wants and I am not going to fork crossdev. I have proposed numerous ways to communicate this problem to the user without touching any of the precious toolchain/embedded packages. If no one responds there, I'll just pick one and apply it.