From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF97513877A for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79078E0ADF; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937AEE0ADA for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (cs-tor.bu.edu [204.8.156.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85D263400B2 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53A03498.6030201@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:29:12 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: crossdev and multilib interference References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org> <1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier> <20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier> <20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> <20140615202434.13082aac@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <539EF0C1.4070206@gentoo.org> <20140616225242.7a695940@caribou.gateway.pace.com> In-Reply-To: <20140616225242.7a695940@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 878050b5-f306-4847-b918-1548921f2453 X-Archives-Hash: 8b393c1bab9eb38872a822ef03148e46 Ryan Hill: > If doing something dumb like installing a i686 crossdev toolchain on > x86_64 breaks things, it's because you've done something dumb. Stop doing > that and things should work better. > There have been several reasons mentioned to do what you call dumb. I'm not going to repeat them. Read the thread.