From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66263-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D1913877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 01:48:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C06AE0A8B;
	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 01:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8B5E0A84
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 01:47:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (tor21.anonymizer.ccc.de [31.172.30.4])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 431853400D3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 01:47:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <539F9E41.9050505@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 01:47:45 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference
References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org>	<1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier>	<20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>	<31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier>	<20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>	<539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org>	<539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org>	<539EF323.7020208@gentoo.org>	<1402944163.8309.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>	<539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> <20140616214257.096c93fc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <539F49C2.6090008@gentoo.org> <539F4DFA.7020706@gentoo.org> <539F5288.1000000@gentoo.org> <539F5AB5.7000006@gentoo.org> <539F6B3C.7030807@gentoo.org> <539F8000.5080804@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <539F8000.5080804@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 95df5f58-a9a7-4b46-aadd-317d000e1a91
X-Archives-Hash: 0410c75abe2552b69bcaed571f7d133a

Joshua Kinard:
> 
> How big of a patch would this change require to the existing crossdev ebuild?
> 

Probably quite trivial, but since vapier said "bs" to that proposal
(translates to "bullshit" I guess) I'll not put any work into that.

So there we go. If you are cool, you can just say "bs", vanish and leave
stable arch in a broken state.

Not even QA cares. Great. I'll try to get it on the next council agenda
then.