From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B3C13877A for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C50EE0D49; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C29E0D2D for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (unknown [114.91.164.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA9ED33FDE1 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <539F7CD8.9080907@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:25:12 +0800 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org> <1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier> <20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier> <20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> <539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org> <539EF323.7020208@gentoo.org> <1402944163.8309.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> <20140616214257.096c93fc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <539F49C2.6090008@gentoo.org> <539F4DFA.7020706@gentoo.org> <539F5288.1000000@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <539F5288.1000000@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 92b3a927-9857-41da-a7de-f225d936c85f X-Archives-Hash: 7f67c9a64033c339fe5251c727bd32db On 06/17/2014 04:24 AM, hasufell wrote: >> What about those of us who have been using crossdev to generate >> cross-compilers for years w/o issue, because we run non-multilib? >> Hardmasking crossdev to solve multilib problems doesn't accomplish anything, >> other than just irk us. Why not hardmask the multilib stuff instead and >> leave crossdev alone? >> > > Hardmask half of the tree instead of a single package? Does not sound > reasonable. The fallout will be _huge_ for users who already run > multilib. You will basically get an emerge dump of 500+ blockers. That's not a bug ;) Since I can't figure out how any of these multibuilds work (that's no longer an ebuild ...) I'm not opposed to have them removed from my workflow.