From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FFD13877A for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5EA4E0F5A; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0575EE0F51 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (CPE002401f30b73-CM78cd8ec1b205.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2475933FBD4 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <539F5327.4060500@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:27:19 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org> <1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier> <20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier> <20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> <539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org> <539EF323.7020208@gentoo.org> <1402944163.8309.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> <20140616214257.096c93fc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <539F49C2.6090008@gentoo.org> <539F4DFA.7020706@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <539F4DFA.7020706@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 909d2687-36e0-497e-ae24-b95bd109384c X-Archives-Hash: 238001abbd934ddc6da5e32ab9e9786e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 16/06/14 04:05 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 06/16/2014 15:47, hasufell wrote: >> So I don't see what else we can do here other than taking more >> radical steps to INFORM users of these possible breakages... and >> that's exactly what a hardmask is for. > > What about those of us who have been using crossdev to generate > cross-compilers for years w/o issue, because we run non-multilib? > Hardmasking crossdev to solve multilib problems doesn't accomplish > anything, other than just irk us. Why not hardmask the multilib > stuff instead and leave crossdev alone? well, we could hardmask in the multilib profiles... but that's a bit of a digression -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlOfUyYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPA1TAD+JYjgKnwabCy9qPiwZAKgXkxH Nj4kzhLSQ0HF+5CCHIYBAKEG8Yt65JhTIKOCwEHLx+7Kh4p0xtZcVBLnE3dIROrf =iyqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----