From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B7D13877A for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98415E0AFE; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1A2E07AE for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.191] (ipservice-092-208-240-197.pools.arcor-ip.net [92.208.240.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1400A33FDE7 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:43:15 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org> <1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier> <20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier> <20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c9a2c64b-0a74-44cd-b39c-d26d7f057f76 X-Archives-Hash: 8a67bd7ac8aac4801df98109f15824e9 hasufell schrieb: > No improvements so far. I am going to hardmask sys-devel/crossdev, > unless someone can explain why we are still in broken stage. > > More packages are popping up that randomly break. Recent failures were > related to tc-getBUILD_CC. > > This isn't stable in any way. I'm not blaming anyone, but that's what > hardmasking is for. A working solution was declined, so... If I understand correctly, it is not the crossdev package being present on the system, but the generated toolchains that cause the trouble. I think there are less intrusive options than hardmask, such as pkg_pretend() check or blocking offending packages from cross-${CTARGET} category. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn